Jason Bourne

jason-bourneAs a movie, Jason Bourne both succeeds and fails at the same time. It succeeds because it is a mostly-competent action flick but it fails because it has some pretty big shoes to fill after The Bourne Identity, The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum. While sharing the same name and character as the three aforementioned movies, Jason Bourne does not compare favorably to them.

Once again Matt Damon reprises his role as the titular superspy/assassin Jason Bourne (after having sat out of the Bourne Legacy). Again the CIA is after Bourne. Again Bourne must use his CIA training to stay ahead of the CIA and expose them. Nicky Parsons (Julia Styles) is now working for an underground activist/hacker group, having left the CIA. She is the only character (besides Bourne, himself) to appear from the original trilogy. She contacts Bourne after hacking into the CIA and discovering some unsettling information about several black ops that the CIA is behind. A CIA analyst Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander)  discovers Nicky’s breach and brings it to the attention of the CIA’s director (Tommy Lee Jones). The Director enlists Lee’s help to find Nicky and hopefully Jason Bourne as well. Bourne uses his well-honed skills in a cat-and-mouse game to try to expose black ops programs without being caught. In the process, Bourne learns more disturbing background information about the black ops program he was initiated into.

While Jason Bourne taken by itself is more or less a decent action flick, it does not compare favorably to the first three installments. We learned that Bourne was not the good guy, he was in many ways the villain. Losing his memory caused a break with the CIA and gave him a chance to redeem himself by exposing the truth about the black ops program he (willingly) participated in. Jason Bourne is just more of the same, really the filmmakers have already covered this ground thoroughly. In fact, Jason Bourne was a wasted opportunity to show the decline of a superspy as Matt Damon is now pushing 50. He looks tired and disinterested in the role.

The well-done, iconic fight scenes from the first three have been replaced by lazy, poorly choreographed imposters in the new film. One haunting moment from The Bourne Ultimatum has Bourne reluctantly using his lethal skills to kill Desh, a CIA-sent assassin set to kill Nicky. After Bourne dispatches him after a prolonged, knock-down, drag-out fight, the camera focuses on Bourne allowing the audience to see the conflict in Bourne. At this point Bourne realizes he’s not one of the good guys. His training and blind obedience has made him a ruthless killer.

While Jason Bourne is competently made and directed, it seems to be little more than a cash grab trading on the Jason Bourne name.

Worth a look if you really like the series and want to know what’s next for Bourne.

Skip it if you don’t want this movie to ruin the original trilogy.

Click on the following link to place a hold:

Jason Bourne






Gods of Egypt

gods-of-egyptGods of Egypt is a train wreck of a movie. It’s one of those movies which is so bad it’s fun to watch, viewed in the right frame of mind.

Things are prosperous in ancient Egypt. When the god Osiris (played by Bryan Brown) abdicates his throne to give to his son Horus (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) the evil god Set (Gerard Butler) kills Osiris and takes the throne for himself. Set blinds Horus by stealing his eyes which subsequently deprives him of his powers. Set casts him out to wallow in self-pity. Set begins his reign of terror by conquering all the areas surrounding Egypt.

In a parallel story line, a lowly mortal thief, Bek (Brenton Thwaites) loses his true love, Zaya (Courtney Eaton) after Set’s temple builder, Urshu (Rufus Sewell) kills her. The two story lines converge when Bek seeks out Horus with the hope that the god can bring Zaya back from the dead. In turn, Bek promises to help Horus by getting his eyes back so that he can regain his powers and ultimately defeat Set before the world is plunged into chaos.

One big problem with the movie is that most of the major roles are played by white actors of Northern European descent. Brenton Thwaites and Bryan Brown are Australian; Rufus Sewell is English; Gerard Butler is Scottish; and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau is Danish. So right off the bat, there are lots of white guys playing characters from Northern Africa. Gerard Butler’s heavy Scottish accent is troublesome as well. It seems as though he’s from the Scottish section of Egypt.

The CGI is mostly good, but does look unfinished and hurried in some scenes. But to be fair, the backdrop of ancient Egypt is stunningly rendered in CGI; it’s apparent that a lot of the CGI budget was spent on this.

Despite its flaws, God’s of Egypt is an entertaining movie. The action sequences are well done and the CGI makes the Egyptian gods look larger than the mortals. The storyline is a creative re-imagining of the ancient Egyptian myths.

Gods of Egypt is best viewed for what it is: disposable entertainment in which you don’t have to think to hard. If you can just let the movie wash over you, it can be highly entertaining.

Worth a look if you can overlook some of the more glaring flaws and/or you like ancient Egyptian mythology.

Skip it if the at-times-cheesy CGI or white guys playing Northern Africans would annoy you.

Click on the following link to place a hold:

Gods of Egypt




morganMorgan is yet another movie which explores AI (artificial intelligence) and the its ramifications on society. It isn’t a particularly original film and seems to draw from other films such as Bladerunner, Hanna, Lucy, Splice and Ex Machina.

Kate Mara plays Lee Weathers, a corporate risk-management consultant sent to evaluate (and terminate if necessary) an artificial, humanoid being named Morgan (played by Anya Taylor-Joy). Although only five years old, Morgan appears to be a young woman in her early 20s.

Weathers is dispatched by Corporate to evaluate Morgan after she attacks and brutally maims one of the scientists studying her. It is up to Weathers to evaluate the efficacy of Morgan and the L-9 program, which spawned her.

Morgan appears to be demure and shy but as the story develops she becomes increasingly aggressive.  Another vicious assault during an evaluation by a psychiatrist (played by Paul Giamatti) leads to a violent confrontation and a surprising revelation.

Morgan is entertaining despite being mostly derivative. The movie is well cast and the actors turn in good performances. Anyone paying attention to the clues the movie gives will see the twist coming a mile away.

Morgan does pose some interesting questions: what is it to be human? What rights (if any) do artificially-created humans have? If a corporation creates a humanoid being does the corporation own the being? If so, what is the extent of the corporation’s ownership? Should artificial humans even be created? The movie doesn’t really answer any of these, so those looking for answers will be disappointed.

Worth a look if you like sci fi movies which deal with artificial intelligence and the ramifications on society.

Skip it if you don’t like derivative movies.

Click on the following link to place a hold:







Blair Witch

blair-witchBlair Witch is somewhat of a letdown: it is largely the same as its predecessor (The Blair Witch Project) but does get points for attempting to build on the mythology. The problem though is that Blair Witch doesn’t really answer any of the questions posed by the first movie. It seems as if it is a cash-grab trading on the Blair Witch name or an attempt to reboot the franchise. Unfortunately, neither one was successful.

For those not familiar with the basic story, Blair Witch is a found footage horror film in which several young people set out to investigate the legend of the Blair Witch, a local urban legend. This time around the group goes into the Maryland woods armed with video cameras, sound recording equipment, GPS devices, walkie talkies and even a drone. The group is lead by James (played by James Allen McCune) who is trying to find out what happened to his sister, Heather (who disappeared in The Blair Witch Project).

James and his group meet up with two locals, who promise to lead James through the woods to where the footage from the original movie was found. As in the first movie, it isn’t long before strange things start happening and everyone is at each others’ throats. The group gets lost and their technology fails. They hear strange noises and stick figures and piled-up rocks appear seemingly out of nowhere. Tension among the group members causes the two locals to split off and horrible, anomalous things happen to everyone involved.

One thing that Blair Witch does right is  capture the dire effects of being lost, isolated and helpless. This imparts a palpable sense of dread and when things go south for the group, it’s already too late for them. When things take a turn for the worse, there is no build up and no warning. One minute things are okay, the next there is no hope. The only way for the group to avoid their horrific situation was to have never put themselves in it in the first place.

There is a lot of shaky-cam footage in Blair Witch, which can be annoying and distracting. But in a movie like this it is very effective; the nausea induced strengthens the film. Adding to the tension are the many effective jump scares.

Overall, Blair Witch is not as good as The Blair Witch Project. The Blair Witch was never shown in The Blair Witch Project; it was left up to the viewer to interpret the events.  Blair Witch, on the other hand,  implies that the cause of the events may be indeed supernatural, maybe even caused by the Blair Witch, herself. It is interesting to compare and contrast the two films. But ultimately, the introduction of the new mythology only creates more questions than it answers.

Worth a look if you want to learn more of the mythology surrounding the Blair Witch.

Skip it if you think the original is perfect and/or dislike jump scares.

Click on the following links to place a hold:

Blair Witch

The Blair Witch Project

  • Steve